Difference between revisions of "Talk:Main Page"
(→hi all: new section) |
(Undo revision 5012 by 93.86.122.45 (Talk)) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
What is the stand on spoilers here? Should spoilerish things be tagged as such or should one consider everything a spoiler as soon as one opens a quest's page? | What is the stand on spoilers here? Should spoilerish things be tagged as such or should one consider everything a spoiler as soon as one opens a quest's page? | ||
Related questions: Are short descriptions of a quest's chapters useful (e.g. Dive or Mudy) ? | Related questions: Are short descriptions of a quest's chapters useful (e.g. Dive or Mudy) ? | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Revision as of 12:26, 8 March 2010
Personally, I feel we need more links to quests. It's a bit of a pain going through the archive page by page looking for specific quests. --173.201.16.248 02:27, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
That's sort of the reasoning behind the entire category system. Did you see the categorized quest index? If not, what can we do to encourage people to notice the category thing? Manual pages require so much overhead, they're kinda comparatively maddening due to their lack of dynamic changing. -- Adept 03:01, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
I meant something like a link to the first chapter or something in the little blurb about it. There are links for some, but a good deal do not have links. This can make it difficult to find the first part of a quest in the archive, especially when it does not start by showing the quest name, or if you haven't seen the artist yet.--173.201.16.248 13:57, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
What is the stand on spoilers here? Should spoilerish things be tagged as such or should one consider everything a spoiler as soon as one opens a quest's page? Related questions: Are short descriptions of a quest's chapters useful (e.g. Dive or Mudy) ?
